Friday, January 18, 2013

Whole Grains: Not always healthy




Whole grain foods may not always be healthy because the current norms for labeling them as such are inconsistent and possibly misleading, says a new Harvard study.
One of the most widely used industry criteria, the whole grain stamp, actually identified grain products that were higher in both sugars and calories than products without the stamp.
The benefits of switching from refined to whole grain foods are well established, including lower risk of cardiovascular disease, weight gain, and type two diabetes, the journal Public Health Nutrition reports. 
“Given the significant prevalence of refined grains, starches, and sugars in modern diets identifying a unified criterion to identify higher quality carbohydrates is a key priority in public health,” said Rebecca Mozaffarian, study author from the social and behavioral sciences department at Harvard School of Public Health.
Based on the evidences, the US Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) 2010 dietary guidelines recommend that Americans consume at least three servings of whole grain products daily and the new US national school lunch standards require that at least half of all meals be whole grain-rich. However, no single standard exists for defining any product as a “whole grain”.
From two major US grocers, researchers identified a total of 545 grain products in eight categories: breads, bagels, English muffins, cereals crackers, cereal bars, granola bars and chips.
They collected nutrition content, ingredients lists, and the presence or absence of the Whole Grain Stamp on product packages from all of these products, according to a Harvard statement.
They found that grains products with the whole grain stamp, one of the most widely used front of package symbols, were higher in fibre and lower in trans fats, but also contained significantly more sugar and calorie compared to products without stamp.
The three USDA recommended criteria also had mixed performance for identifying healthier grain products. Overall, the American Heart Association’s standard (a ratio of total carbohydrate to fibre) proved to be the best indicator of overall healthfulness. 
Source Himalayan Times

2 comments:

  1. The idea and the suggestion are the great however it is always not possible to selection which one is the good or not.So in my opinion the best way maintain the quality of those grains upto certain level can be achieved by standarization with proper certification of those commercial products.

    ReplyDelete
  2. yes you are true but we nepalese people still have an orthodox view consuming whole grain is far better than the refined one. many people still believe that refined wheat flour is carcinogenic and they have given up consuming the refined one.

    ReplyDelete